Subject	A 2+2 Z is better looking
Posted by	Crim on February 07, 2007 at 11:21 AM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	A 2 seat Z is better looking. posted by ZJeweler on February 07, 2007 at 11:14 AM
Message	its a matter of opinion :) 1990 2+2 TwinTurbo 1992 NX2000 (SR20DE-T) 1998 Suzuki GS500e
Follow Ups	Does a 2+2 TT have harder time putting the HP down - autoracing1 10:40:51 02/07/07 What do you mean? - ni[X]it 10:46:21 02/07/07 huh? - AntiHero 10:50:22 02/07/07 well I guess I am crazy, but thanks for the info (n/m) - autoracing1 10:52:16 02/07/07 PS; - ni[X]it 10:51:05 02/07/07 so being 6' 6 and 225 in a 2+2 TT should be just fine - autoracing1 10:53:36 02/07/07 JUST FINE for WHAT? - ni[X]it 10:56:09 02/07/07 ok ok let me start from the top - autoracing1 11:02:29 02/07/07 Just tt your 2+2 then. (n/m) - ZJeweler 11:08:24 02/07/07 if there is no advantages to a standard TT over a 2+2 TT - autoracing1 11:12:02 02/07/07 A 2 seat Z is better looking. - ZJeweler 11:14:01 02/07/07 your right...thanks for the info (n/m) - autoracing1 11:17:03 02/07/07 A 2+2 Z is better looking - Crim 11:21:03 02/07/07 your opinion is wrong (n/m) - Guapo 11:21:54 02/07/07 2nd... :) (n/m) - LUNZ 11:27:53 02/07/07 3rd (n/m) - SnowManZ 11:28:14 02/07/07 4th. (n/m) - CatnipZ 11:39:31 02/07/07 5th (n/m) - aliaZ 11:46:18 02/07/07 No no no! YOUR opinion is wrong. (n/m) - Crim 11:53:58 02/07/07 False. (n/m) - Inzane 13:37:16 02/07/07 Your false is false. 2+2 FTW! (n/m) - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 19:02:39 02/07/07 Fundamentally. (n/m) - Kenny 13:32:40 02/07/07 The rear overhang of a 2+2 looks too long. (n/m) - twinturbopoweredz 11:39:40 02/07/07 yep (n/m) - aliaZ 11:46:51 02/07/07 you will also get the 4.08 NA gearing, which is grand. (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 11:32:54 02/07/07 Isn't there more room in a 2+0? - Twainsville 11:56:25 02/07/07 You're way off. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:23:59 02/07/07 can you explain further...thanks (n/m) - autoracing1 12:18:49 02/07/07 I think he means you're nowhere near being "on" - dogpile 15:46:29 02/07/07 no - infact the 2+2's put down power better because - ztunerz 11:48:33 02/07/07 No you are all waaaay off. This is the way to get power - Audioquest 12:15:06 02/07/07 lol what is that... - zleepertt(MD) 12:23:55 02/07/07 Ha! I guess so. Too bad they didn't make a 2+2+2 Z (n/m) - Audioquest 12:33:30 02/07/07 And that offsets the additional weight compared to TT? (n/m) - MidLifeZ (DFW) 12:16:40 02/07/07 how much do you think a 2+2 tt weights over a 2.0 TT ? - ztunerz 13:27:39 02/07/07 can you explain further..thanks (n/m) - autoracing1 12:16:54 02/07/07 it's a marginal difference at best - ZEngineer 12:21:59 02/07/07 I agree but at 6'6 I really don - autoracing1 12:26:37 02/07/07 If you don't really have a *choice*, - CatnipZ 12:30:24 02/07/07 Well, he COULD install a clear plastic bubble - TT XTZ 15:30:15 02/07/07 You.. I.. - CatnipZ 15:37:55 02/07/07 Re: it's a marginal difference at best - D-JAY 12:28:02 02/07/07 thats because it lacks the best line of the entire design .. - Guapo 12:35:13 02/07/07 I'm thinking gas tank behind rear wheels plus longer wheel - Guapo 12:23:55 02/07/07 False, 2+2 looks > 2+0 looks (n/m) - Crim 12:29:23 02/07/07 function > form - BradZ (Go Gators!) 12:30:07 02/07/07 i was wondering which retard would be the first with a wing - Guapo 12:36:03 02/07/07 We prefer the term "special." Just like my 2+2. (n/m) - BradZ (Go Gators!) 12:49:53 02/07/07 looks are personal pref but to answer your question - ztunerz 13:30:51 02/07/07 Put a 90-93 TT spoiler on the 2+2 - ZXRider(SoCal) 12:37:26 02/07/07 nice car....your right about the spoiler (n/m) - autoracing1 12:47:02 02/07/07 It's true. Spoilers totally change the look. (n/m) - BradZ (Go Gators!) 12:51:27 02/07/07 I know someone who might be looking to sell there TT 2+2 - Tony@GZperformance 13:19:59 02/07/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.